Skip to main content

Board Orientation: It Begins with the First Conversation


How well does your organization orient its board members to their work? I know organizations that do a great job of it and organizations that have never given it a passing thought. Stop and ponder this for a moment: are people born with the expertise to serve on a nonprofit board?

Then how does one acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to be an effective board member? I suspect that many would say that they learned by watching others and doing the work assigned to them. All well and good, I suppose, if we simply want board members who rubber stamp the leader’s decisions. Now stop and ponder this: the nature of nonprofit work and funding is increasingly complex due to any number of things, including increased professionalization, greater scrutiny from government, regulators and funders, heated competition for audience and dollars, and relentless escalation of fixed overhead costs. This is the nonprofit world as we now know it. It is not for the faint of heart.

What ways can board and staff leaders help lessen the steep (and getting steeper) incline of this learning curve?

It certainly begins with an orientation to an organization. Those organizations that do provide formal orientation programs for board members usually do so after they have been elected to the board. I’d like to suggest that orientation really starts at the first contact with an individual to discuss board service. This initial conversation is framed by a forthright explanation of wants and needs of the organization. Every subsequent conversation with a candidate will explore aspects of the organization in more depth and will be supported with all kinds of material, from the board job description to the strategic plan. It is all orientation.

Pre-board election orientation is critical to separating willing, engaged candidates from those who are unable to serve or unskilled for the task. I like doing indepth orientation sessions with candidates before election, because I think it gives both the person and the institution the opportunity to say “not the right fit”.

What are some of the elements of an indepth orientation session? Here’s my list:

  • Top-to-bottom tour of the nonprofit’s facilities with staff, leaky roofs and cramped work spaces as well as the beautiful lobby
  • An honest, no-holes-barred sit-down with board and staff leadership to discuss mission, program, finances, planning; organizational strengths and weaknesses; governance challenges; successes and failures -- this is your opportunity to lay it all on the table
  • A review of the board job description
  • A notebook or CD of supporting material
  • Plenty of opportunity for Q & A
  • A deadline for decision
Photo: Brújula | Compass by [parapente]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Back in the Saddle

MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin.  We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week.  If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014.  It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog.  I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs.  Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management.  Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for?  This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.)  Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although