Values and Principles - An Organization's Bedrock

When you see these two words - values and principles - is your first inclination to say they are the same thing? While they share a critical connection – in that you can’t have one without the other – there is an important difference between the two. And, it might be quite important to know the difference when thinking about your organization.

When we talk about institutional values, we’re talking about strong and enduring beliefs based on assumptions or understandings about what is worthwhile or desirable. For many nonprofit cultural institutions, values tend to focus on understandings such as respect, excellent, authenticity, community, education.

Here’s the values statement from the Ohio Historical Society:

Customer service and focus

Respect and opportunity for Society employees

Excellence

Action- and results-oriented

Authenticity

Teamwork and partnership
Continual learning and improvement

It’s unlikely that these values will change much, if at all, over time. They are the touchstone, the bedrock, the wellspring for what our institutions stand for. As one member of a discussion list I subscribe to wrote, “Sometimes we are very aware of values and sometimes they are so latent that we base our decision and work on them without consciously ‘knowing’ them or anticipating their impact on us and others.”

Principles are articulated tenets based on an organization’s values. They become the operational roadmap by which we recognize and measure how we do things. They permeate an organization’s work. The Textile Museum of Canada (Toronto) weds values and principles in the following statement:

Respect

* We are audience/visitor centred and provide an accessible, welcoming environment for visitors, volunteers, members and staff

* We foster generosity of spirit

* We believe in community and cultural diversity

* We respect the contributions of individuals

Excellence

* We practice high museological standards as we preserve and promote textiles of world-wide significance.

* We foster a culture of philanthropy

* We value a healthy and sustainable organization

Education

* We are committed to life-long learning

* We reach out to a broad sector of the population through our core programs

Innovation

* We nurture research and artistic creativity through a range of media and activities

* We embrace a diversity of opinions

Like values, operating principles may be latent. But don’t you think identifying and understanding your institution’s values and principles can be a powerful motivator to perform at a higher level? And given this uncertain economic swirl we’re in, doesn’t it make sense to bring even greater focus to what your organization stands for and how you do your work?

What Would Make You Turn Down an Invitation to Join a Board?

THERE'S SO MUCH WRITTEN ABOUT RECRUITING BOARD TALENT, I thought I'd spend a little time thinking about it from the prospect's point of view. Clearly, there are boards where the line is long to get on them. But what would make you turn down an invitation? Here's a short list to get the conversation started: 1. You've had no prior exposure to the organization. Your immediate reaction is "did you pull my name out of a hat?" (Is that lady in the picture the head of the Nominating Committee?) Seems as though there must be a hidden agenda at work (like you're rich and once you become a board member you'll pour all your resources into the organization) or the organization is simply looking for any warm body to fill a seat. 2. The organization doesn't have a good reputation. There's something to be said for street cred. An organization that's floundering may be strengthened by your participation or you may find yourself sucked into...

What to Do With Dead Wood on Your Board?

MY POLL ASKED WHAT ONE BOARD DYNAMIC YOU would change this year and the top response was "remove dead wood". For my first post on this topic I'd like to start with two obvious facts: 1) most boards have some non-performing or under-performing board members AND 2) most boards already have mechanisms in place for removing dead wood...or at least the non-attending dead wood. Those mechanisms are found in the Bylaws and perhaps in a board job description. Few boards, it seems, invoke these mechanisms, mostly out of fear of offending the offender. We end up side-stepping the dead wood, dancing around it, ignoring it, wishing mightily it would go away. Oh, and complaining about it. So, even though the dead wood isn't doing much, it's sapping the energy and focus of many others. (There must be a Law of Physics about this!) Where to start and how to implement? While removing dead wood is not the most pleasant of responsibilities, it does not need to be -- and s...

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .

Leading by Design

Search This Blog