Skip to main content

Are You Unique...Really?


I'm here to tell you -- if you didn't already know it -- that the word "unique" has pretty much lost its punch.  Because it's used to describe an overwhelming amount of otherwise mediocre or mundane subjects, I find myself treating sentences containing the word with some suspicion, even disrespect.

One finds the word "unique" used a lot in mission statements. The intent is to garner support by implying that a program, a building or a collection has no equal.  However, declaring uniqueness doesn't necessarily make it so.

The sheer number and variety of cultural institutions in this country generally cancels out the uniqueness factor.  Chances are, if there's one of you, there's probably more.  And for some types of organizations, there's A LOT more.  We certainly know that about historic house museums and children's museums, community theatre groups, and kids art camps.  Just because your organization exists doesn't make it unique.

If we were to banish "unique" from our organizational lexicons, we'd have to work much harder to describe what makes us truly stand out from the pack.  In doing so, we run the risk of finding out our organization doesn't really stand out at all. On the one hand, you'd develop a focused set of attributes that set the pace for all you do; on the other hand, you'd have identified a challenge to be met.  

Either way you win.

Image:  i'm unique. by _ okat


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Back in the Saddle

MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin.  We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week.  If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014.  It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog.  I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs.  Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management.  Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for?  This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.)  Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .