Board Recruitment: Attributes and Skill Sets

A colleague of mine was asked to participate in a discussion this week about her experiences as a board member. Knowing that I've worked for and with a good number of boards, she wanted to get my take on some of the questions the discussion was going to be structured around.

Her first question to me was, "What do you think are the characteristics of a great board member?" Funny she should have asked me that as I've been thinking about that recently myself. I ticked off a few characteristics -- passionate about the organization's mission, forward-thinking, optimistic, etc. "What about skills -- like financial acuity or a legal background?" she countered.

Skills are good, too, I agreed, but I was thinking about a retired history teacher who was on the board of a local history museum. Sure, the guy knew A LOT about history, but he monopolized conversations and dampened the group's ability to generate ideas. You wanted to say to this fellow, "Hey, you're not standing at the front of a classroom anymore!"

I brought myself up short then. "You can have a person with some terrific skill set, but if he or she doesn't fit the board's culture or the organization's culture, then it's likely not to be a productive fit for either." Hmmm.....chosen for fitting in with the existing culture or enhancing it or....changing it. These reasons alone are enough to make board recruitment a much more intentional activity.

My colleague felt that she and her organization did that -- more or less -- through the committee system. Almost everyone on the board had served first in a committee capacity. Performance there would indicate how well or poorly an individual would perform at the board level. "And in a small town, you pretty much know who's going to be good and who isn't," she concluded.

It was time for me to throw in one more thought: if recruitment is truly based on attributes and skills, the process may well lead to people you do not know or know well. Boards tend to look a lot like the people who assemble them. And because board members typically serve for years (or decades or lifetimes) at a time, perspectives and approaches to the work can become routine, even stale. By their nature boards are about stability; the downside is they can run out of oxygen. It's the recruitment process that ensures there's always enough oxygen in the fish tank.

Photo: African Cichlid Tank by calwhiz

Back in the Saddle

MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin. We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week. If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014. It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog. I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs. Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management. Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for? This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.) Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although

Leading by Design

Search This Blog