Encouraging Your Board to Engage in Self-Assessment

MUCH OF THE WORK I DO WITH BOARDS involves some level of assessment about organizational strengths and weaknesses and the structure of the board to address them. About three-quarters of these groups will eventually get around to voicing the fact that they don't do enough talking about these most basic, yet most critical, issues. In the hustle of organizational life, these boards and staff haven't yet realized that they can take some "time out" to review and reflect.

Self-assessment can be many things: it can focus on organizational strengths and weaknesses, it can focus on board effectiveness in broad ways or it can focus solely on how the board is working at one meeting. Macro or micro, a bit of self-assessment is, as the old advertising slogan declared, "the pause that refreshes."

So, how might you go about some self-assessment with your board if you've never done anything like it before? I think one of the easiest ways to get the conversation started is simply to devote time at a board meeting to make a list on a flip chart of organizational strengths and weaknesses. It's highly likely that you'll uncover a great deal of consensus about some basic issues that you might not have known existed. That alone can be a tremendous sense of accomplishment for a group!

Once you've gone around the table and encouraged everyone to add an item or two to the list, take some time to figure out what 1-3 weaknesses deserve some attention right away. It's likely the discussion will result in some immediate actionable steps.

Or you might simply want to pose a question to get folks talking about why they care about the organization and want to be a part of it. This won't get you much critical analysis about organizational effectiveness, but it will encourage board members to open up in ways they generally wouldn't otherwise. This type of conversation helps to build a sense of trust and teamwork that can lead to critical analysis.

Want to go a bit more in-depth? I think a survey tool is a good way to encourage deeper reflection. You'll find a number of self-assessment tools online ranging from one-page, check-the-box surveys designed to gauge the level of understanding or engagement of board members in the big chunks of their responsibilities, to longer, more nuanced surveys. All are fair game for adaptation.

One survey I'm working with right now attempts to gauge a board member's understanding and alignment around the following areas: mission, finance, compliance, board composition and function, and board-director interface. My client and I adapted it from a survey used by a similar cultural institution. This survey ends with the request to "Please finish this sentence using your own words: Serving on this board board has helped me to develop...." Concerns raised in this survey will be used to develop a board-staff retreat agenda.

Photo: formative e-assessment concept map from yish

Back in the Saddle

MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin. We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week. If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014. It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog. I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs. Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management. Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for? This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.) Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although

Leading by Design

Search This Blog