Skip to main content

Fix It or Ditch It?

Image
By
Without question, the common denominator among most -- if not all -- of the nonprofits I work with is that they carry a heavy load of organizational activities.  Staff, volunteers, money, and space are stretched to their limits.  The programmatic calendar is full.  The school buses are lined up at the door.   A public expectation has been created that must now be met again and again.   The load is getting heavier. Let's hope the bottom doesn't drop out.  

Does this picture look familiar?  A common trait across the nonprofit sector is that institutions, particularly smaller ones, tend to take on a fair amount of work without first determining its costs and its benefits. The heavy load gets heavier and no one wants to dump any of it.  How do you choose?  Here's what I hear: 'Wouldn't someone be offended if a program, procedure or policy were suddenly jettisoned to make way for something new?' or 'We've been doing this activity so long that it defines us' or how 'bout the dreaded 'This is what we've always done (or how we've always done it)!'

So now get a mental picture of your organization's human and financial resources.  Think of them as the dinner plate that holds all the lovely programmatic and administrative food.  The size of the plate is determined by the amount of human and financial resources -- and time -- your organization has at its command.  Now, start adding the mission-related activities to the plate.  Bet it's getting full.  Don't forget to add the non-mission-related stuff you've gotten sucked into.  Now your plate looks like it's gone through the smorgasbord line a couple of times.

If you've been reading this blog for a bit, you are aware of my posts about developing criteria by which to measure sustainability and success.  Hopefully, you've mined some nuggets that may be gold.  Here are a few more really basic thoughts that might help you decide what to keep on your plate and what to take away:
  • make an inventory of what's on your organizational plate and share that with your nonprofit's decision-makers (frankly, I think I'd share it with everybody -- you all share the plate).
  • using your mission and strategic plan as a guide, take one set of your organizational activities on that plate, such as special events, exhibitions, elementary school programs, etc., and sort them into three big piles:  Meets Mission, Fix to Better Meet Mission, and Ditch.
  • focus on the Fix pile.  Chances are you can't fix all at once so create a couple more criteria to filter the fix pile down to one or two you can reasonably work on in the next 6 months or so. (In fact, a timeframe like that could be a filter.)
  • develop the rationales for ditching the Ditch pile.
  • too many Meets Mission activities?  What filters can you apply to winnow that pile down? (check here and here for some help)
  • think about ways to make your plate bigger.
  • acknowledge that any new item added to the plate means something that's already there needs to come off.
  • maintain this discipline.  You get the gold star if you do.
Photo:  thumbs up, thumbs down by Donna Pinciotti

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

By
If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for?  This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.)  Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although
26 comments
Read more

Back in the Saddle

By
MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin.  We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week.  If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014.  It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog.  I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs.  Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management.  Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu
14 comments
Read more

What Would Make You Turn Down an Invitation to Join a Board?

By
THERE'S SO MUCH WRITTEN ABOUT RECRUITING BOARD TALENT, I thought I'd spend a little time thinking about it from the prospect's point of view. Clearly, there are boards where the line is long to get on them. But what would make you turn down an invitation? Here's a short list to get the conversation started: 1. You've had no prior exposure to the organization. Your immediate reaction is "did you pull my name out of a hat?" (Is that lady in the picture the head of the Nominating Committee?) Seems as though there must be a hidden agenda at work (like you're rich and once you become a board member you'll pour all your resources into the organization) or the organization is simply looking for any warm body to fill a seat. 2. The organization doesn't have a good reputation. There's something to be said for street cred. An organization that's floundering may be strengthened by your participation or you may find yourself sucked into
15 comments
Read more