Deliberate Practice as an Institutional Imperative

Geoff Colvin's recent book, Talent is Overrated, explores the whys and hows that separate "world-class performers from everybody else". Most of us might believe that top achievers are destined for stardom, but tons of research indicates that isn't the case. Top achievers hone their talents during many long hours of deliberate practice that are designed to nurture understanding and stretch ability.

Deliberate practice can be defined as a sustained -- usually lengthy -- period of calculated effort designed to improve performance. Whether it's music, a sport, or improving memory, the outstanding performers got that way through sheer, hard work. This work is typically shaped by teachers, enriched by mentors, and encouraged by parents, teammates, or friends. While some of the practice may happen in groups, much of it happens on one's own.

Most of the studies supporting the deliberate practice model have been done with musicians, athletes and chess players, because it's relatively easy to document the practice-performance ratio as well as to factor in physical attributes that may help an individual excel. However, studies of Nobel Prize-winning scientists show that, just as with musicians or athletes, years of study and work were required to first master their fields and specialties before they were then able to add significant new information to it.

Colvin asks, if deliberate practice is the key to individual and team performance, what might any of this have to do with organizational performance? It would seem a great deal, since organizations are ultimately only as good as the people who lead, manage and nurture them. Yet, there's a definite lack of deliberate practice happening in many institutions.

The notions of nurturing talent by allowing for the acquisition and practice of knowledge and skills are still considered luxuries, especially by organizations that are struggling to get started or stay afloat. Yet, Colvin argues, "...the principles of great performance can help improve such organizations to the point where they might actually dare to think about greatness. That is, the principles can do this if they're applied....Applying the principles is becoming an imperative for all organizations that want to survive."

So, here's an abbreviated list of deliberate practice principles great organizations apply to individuals and teams -- these go for staff, board and volunteers (you'll have to read the book to find out how great organizations apply them!):

1. Understand that each person in the organization is not just doing a job, but is also being stretched and grown.

2. Find ways to develop leaders within their jobs.

3. Identify promising performers early.

4. Understand that people development works best through inspiration not authority.

5. Invest significant time, money, and energy in developing people. (Time and energy go a long way when money is at a premium.)

6. Make leadership development part of the culture.

7. Develop teams, not just individuals: be conscious of picking wrong team members, of competing agendas and conflicts of interest, unresolved conflicts and unwillingness to face the real issues.

Photo: Reach for the Stars by MaryWit

Back in the Saddle

MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin. We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week. If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014. It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog. I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs. Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management. Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for? This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.) Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .

Leading by Design

Search This Blog