Skip to main content

Fostering Good Board Ideas

IN HER RECENT BLOG POST "Where good (board) ideas come from", Debra Beck links to a great video (you've just got to watch it) and poses the questions "Do we nurture breathing room and value insights shared amidst the rush to check reports off the agenda? Do we foster opportunities for good ideas inside board members' heads to make it to the surface so they can be connected?"
Thoughts of inspirational discussions and deep-diving into issues that were cut short by a too-full agenda and not enough time came flooding over me as I read Debra's post.  Yes, I've been in those situations and I look back on them with mixed emotions knowing that some great conversations will never be rekindled and some organizational energy was lost.
So, how can we build in time for idea generation, rumination, and synergy at the board and staff levels?  Here are some of my thoughts:
  • It's counter-intuitive, but the space to spark and nurture ideas needs to be planned.  We like to think that idea generation is improvisational, spur-of-the-moment, a random act -- and yes, it often is that.  But, it's one thing to react creatively to a stream of conversation and quite another to take ideas to the point where they might actually put down roots.  If you can pluck an idea from the stream and get it in some terra firma in 30-45 minutes, then do it, otherwise it'll float away.
  • The best ideas are often borne from seemingly opposite perspectives.  That's one of the reasons why board and staff diversity is so important.  An organization can expand its perspectives by making space for periodic or ongoing stakeholder meetups and think tanks.  I see great potential in gathering together a variety of people to focus on idea generation around specific organizational issues -- not committees per se and maybe not even task forces, although they might well function as a task force.  It's the perfect blend of planning and improv.
  • There are organizations (although I don't know any personally) that have "blue sky" committees -- formal groups just for knocking around ideas and creating new connections.  I like the idea, but they'll only work if there's some supporting structure around them that can absorb the best ideas into the organization's culture.
  • The coffeehouse, retreat and salon are idea incubators that many boards and staff don't use enough.  After-hours brainstorming and ruminating are best done in relaxed settings.  Where better than the neighborhood restaurant, a cabin in the woods or someone's deck?  There just needs to be a plan in place to move the good conversation to another level for nurturing.
  • I'm also intrigued by the town hall concept, where a large group of people work on one or more issues with the guidance of facilitators.  What would be gained by the local museum holding a town hall or two a year?  I think a lot.
How is your organization capturing and fostering good ideas?
Photo:  yes and no from *_Abhi_*


Popular posts from this blog

Back in the Saddle

MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin.  We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week.  If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014.  It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog.  I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs.  Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management.  Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .

What Would Make You Turn Down an Invitation to Join a Board?

THERE'S SO MUCH WRITTEN ABOUT RECRUITING BOARD TALENT, I thought I'd spend a little time thinking about it from the prospect's point of view. Clearly, there are boards where the line is long to get on them. But what would make you turn down an invitation? Here's a short list to get the conversation started: 1. You've had no prior exposure to the organization. Your immediate reaction is "did you pull my name out of a hat?" (Is that lady in the picture the head of the Nominating Committee?) Seems as though there must be a hidden agenda at work (like you're rich and once you become a board member you'll pour all your resources into the organization) or the organization is simply looking for any warm body to fill a seat. 2. The organization doesn't have a good reputation. There's something to be said for street cred. An organization that's floundering may be strengthened by your participation or you may find yourself sucked into