Skip to main content

Measuring Success for Transparent Action

Image
By

Linda Norris' Uncataloged Museum blog post on transparency in museums is my impetus to knit together my recent post on measuring success with defining what those measures are. Linda points to the Indianapolis Museum of Art as the site of a great dashboard of measures that welcomes public scrutiny.  

In fact, it appears that the museum's dashboard might be the only public museum dashboard -- and it's almost two-and-a-half years old!  The common denominator in all this is museum director Maxwell Anderson, who developed a lexicon of measures to assess organizational health in 2005 -- transparency has been the by-product.

This isn't to say that museums and other cultural organizations haven't been tracking data for many years. It's the focus of the data and what's done with it that is different.  Let's talk about focus first. 

The Indianapolis Museum of Art tracks activities in 13 broad areas of museum operations.  The resulting data is often quite tightly focused reflecting Anderson's view that tracking too broad or generic categories doesn't reveal enough useful information about long-term mission-relatedness or success.  So visitation, for example, is not just an aggregate number (although that exists), but it's also the number of visitors who are members, and it's an interactive map of admissions by zip code. It's not just a listing of the broad categories of the collection, it's tracking the number of artworks out on loan and the number of new works on view in the galleries.

In Dashboard for Nonprofits (Board Café, May 5, 2005), another sampling of measures was listed including:

1.  Program -- Number of first-time clients. Client satisfaction. Volunteer hours. 

2. Finance -- Days of cash on hand. Net surplus or deficit compared to budget. Days after month end for financial statement preparation. 

3. Fund development -- New individual donors. New foundations or corporations. Total non-government revenue. 

4. Human resources -- Performance evaluations completed on time. Staff meeting or exceeding goals in core job functions. 

5. Board of Directors -- Attendance at board meetings. New board members joining. Executive Director performance evaluation completed on time. 

The data are gathered into colorful charts, graphs and images for use by staff leadership and boards.  And this is known as the Dashboard. Dashboards are nothing new to the corporate world and to some corners of the nonprofit world. The basic premise is this:
Board oversight involves more than just reading financial statements, and nonprofit boards don’t always know how nor have the opportunity to provide adequate programmatic oversight. Dashboard reports communicate critical information to your board in a concise, visual, more compelling way. Dashboards help nonprofit leaders focus attention on what matters most in their organizations.
            -- The Nonprofit Dashboard: A Tool for Tracking Progress by Lawrence M Butler http://www.boardsource.org/Bookstore.asp?Item=1073

Here's a great example of how dashboards help leaders focus on what matters most:  Kate Becker is vice president of Kaboom, a Washington, DC nonprofit that builds hundreds of playgrounds and recreational spaces each year.  "I don't need a dashboard to tell me that staff turnover is important to look at," Ms. Becker told the Chronicle of Philanthropy in 2006. "What the dashboard does is give us a way to analyze all kinds of data at the same time, and see how workload is affecting our goals for more civic engagement."  That's the key right there.

We know that it's not enough to just collect statistics. But what we collect has to help us answer the big 'cause-effect' questions -- how is this affecting our goals for that.  Anderson has gone one important step further -- he and his team have made much of their data publicly available.  Information ready for analysis and for transparency.  What are you waiting for?

Photo:  Dashboard segment from the Indianapolis Museum of Art website, www.imamuseum.org


Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Anne--A great post that I've emailed far and wide! I'm thrilled to have discovered your blog--wonderful resource for nonprofits...and me!
June 1, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Anne W. Ackerson said…
Thanks very much! Glad you found the post useful.

Anne
June 2, 2009 at 7:52 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Would Make You Turn Down an Invitation to Join a Board?

By
THERE'S SO MUCH WRITTEN ABOUT RECRUITING BOARD TALENT, I thought I'd spend a little time thinking about it from the prospect's point of view. Clearly, there are boards where the line is long to get on them. But what would make you turn down an invitation? Here's a short list to get the conversation started: 1. You've had no prior exposure to the organization. Your immediate reaction is "did you pull my name out of a hat?" (Is that lady in the picture the head of the Nominating Committee?) Seems as though there must be a hidden agenda at work (like you're rich and once you become a board member you'll pour all your resources into the organization) or the organization is simply looking for any warm body to fill a seat. 2. The organization doesn't have a good reputation. There's something to be said for street cred. An organization that's floundering may be strengthened by your participation or you may find yourself sucked into...
16 comments
Read more

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

By
If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for?  This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.)  Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although ...
28 comments
Read more

What to Do With Dead Wood on Your Board?

By
MY POLL ASKED WHAT ONE BOARD DYNAMIC YOU would change this year and the top response was "remove dead wood". For my first post on this topic I'd like to start with two obvious facts: 1) most boards have some non-performing or under-performing board members AND 2) most boards already have mechanisms in place for removing dead wood...or at least the non-attending dead wood. Those mechanisms are found in the Bylaws and perhaps in a board job description. Few boards, it seems, invoke these mechanisms, mostly out of fear of offending the offender. We end up side-stepping the dead wood, dancing around it, ignoring it, wishing mightily it would go away. Oh, and complaining about it. So, even though the dead wood isn't doing much, it's sapping the energy and focus of many others. (There must be a Law of Physics about this!) Where to start and how to implement? While removing dead wood is not the most pleasant of responsibilities, it does not need to be -- and s...
2 comments
Read more