Skip to main content

Too Small to Succeed?


Today's post title is a riff on that oft-heard recession phrase, "too big to fail". A recent meeting about saving an historic property, followed closely by a visit with a very small cultural organization, got me to thinking about the basic benchmarks for organizational success. We're learning more all the time about what it takes to create and grow a successful nonprofit. High on my list are:
  • meeting a real (not perceived) need -- this isn't an ego or power trip
  • having a plan to realize it right from the get-go -- many cultural nonprofits get too much of a free pass on this one from incorporating agencies
  • visionary and unflagging leadership -- preferably from more than one person
  • attracting people to the organization who have access to substantial resources, be it time, money, or people with time and money
  • building a critical mass of supporters (a good, growable base right from the start) -- there are some umbrella organizations that require just that of satellites before the shovel hits the ground
  • a quality "product", worthy of support
Certainly, if these basic ingredients are lacking, an organization surely will fail. Now that I see this list in print, I think the first and last items might be the most important. Big or small, rural or urban, if the organization isn't meeting a real community need with the best possible program (or the best possible raw material to make into a really terrific program), who will care enough to provide the juice to keep it going?

My historic property example has intense community interest, but little financial wherewithal to restore and operate it (actual available cash - $0, but some in-kind). And the raw material for the product is more a local story than the national one supporters think it is. On the other hand, the cultural organization I met is very local, but in the eight years it has been active, it has managed to attract only 20 dues-paying members, and nearly half of them are on the board (annual operating budget - $720). Both my examples are fueled by some big dreams, but both are hampered, in my estimation, by an their inability to articulate the
real need they fill.

Are there some nonprofits that are just too small to succeed? Definitely. As for my examples,
time will tell the tale, I think.

Image: Hue Gradation by krisheding

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Back in the Saddle

MY LAST POST WAS NOVEMBER 2012, A LIGHT YEAR AWAY it seems, that marked the beginning of a long push toward completing a manuscript on history museum leadership with my co-author, Joan Baldwin.  We finally submitted 350+ pages to our editor at Rowman & Littlefield this week.  If all goes well, we expect the book to be available in early 2014.  It's taken us two years to get to this point, so six more months or so of revision and production don't seem too long to wait until we can hold the final product in our hands (and you can, too!). The project put a lot of things on hold, including this blog.  I'm glad to be back writing about intentional leadership -- leading by design -- for nonprofit boards and staffs.  Certainly, my thoughts are now informed by the forthcoming book, in which Joan and I posit that nonprofits need to focus resources on leadership, not just management.  Most cultural nonprofits are at a crossroad, as is the sector in general, where nothing is qu

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .

Three Most Important Nonprofit Executive Director Soft Skills

If you were asked to narrow down the list of executive director qualifications to the three most important, which ones would you identify? Would the list consist of soft skills, hard skills, or some combination? Would your list be based on the great ED you are or one you've worked for, or would it be your wish list for the ED you haven't been fortunate yet to work for?  This was an assignment in my recent online class in leadership and administration for the American Association for State and Local History . I asked the class to review three-five advertisements for museum directors and analyze what these listings intimated about the organization’s past experience, current focus and goals, and future aspirations. Then, I asked the class to identify what they consider to be the three most important qualifications they would look for in a director. (Okay, so there's more than three if you dissect my three big groups.)  Soft skills outnumbered hard skills, although