Skip to main content

What Does Your Board Recruitment Process Say About Your Organization?


This post is prompted by an email sent to me by my colleague Linda Norris, the inquiring mind behind The Uncataloged Museum.  The email included a link to a Craig's List listing from a nonprofit in search of board members.  The listing states, in part:
Board Members will commit to meeting once every 2 months. They will be involved in decision making and guiding the direction of the organization. They will assist in fund raising events by establishing committees to plan particular events and initiatives. 

Please respond by email with a little bit about yourself, where you live, and what interests you about [name of organization].  To learn more, visit [organization's website address].
  • Location: Hudson Valley, NY
  • Compensation: Volunteer Work
  • This is a part-time job.
  • This is at a non-profit organization.
Actually, that's pretty much the entire listing.

It got me to thinking that despite the listing's brevity, it speaks volumes about the culture of this organization. Indeed, this is a relatively new nonprofit founded and led by a visionary Gen Y woman. In fact, she named her nonprofit after herself -- which should give you a good idea that she is the singular driving force of her small organization.  Her vision for her work takes a very pragmatic, get-it-done, grassrootsy approach.  The Craig's List approach to board member recruitment fits the age and style of the founder and the nonprofit work she's doing, as well as the energy-level of a new organization. 

Contrast her example with some of the stuff I've been writing about on this blog, such as talent matrices and recruitment planning....stuff I believe is about consciously designing leadership for the long haul.  Sounds pretty rigid when compared to our Craig's Lister.  

What does your board recruitment process say about your organization?  

Photo:  pod meeting by Esthr

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Would Make You Turn Down an Invitation to Join a Board?

THERE'S SO MUCH WRITTEN ABOUT RECRUITING BOARD TALENT, I thought I'd spend a little time thinking about it from the prospect's point of view. Clearly, there are boards where the line is long to get on them. But what would make you turn down an invitation? Here's a short list to get the conversation started: 1. You've had no prior exposure to the organization. Your immediate reaction is "did you pull my name out of a hat?" (Is that lady in the picture the head of the Nominating Committee?) Seems as though there must be a hidden agenda at work (like you're rich and once you become a board member you'll pour all your resources into the organization) or the organization is simply looking for any warm body to fill a seat. 2. The organization doesn't have a good reputation. There's something to be said for street cred. An organization that's floundering may be strengthened by your participation or you may find yourself sucked into...

What to Do With Dead Wood on Your Board?

MY POLL ASKED WHAT ONE BOARD DYNAMIC YOU would change this year and the top response was "remove dead wood". For my first post on this topic I'd like to start with two obvious facts: 1) most boards have some non-performing or under-performing board members AND 2) most boards already have mechanisms in place for removing dead wood...or at least the non-attending dead wood. Those mechanisms are found in the Bylaws and perhaps in a board job description. Few boards, it seems, invoke these mechanisms, mostly out of fear of offending the offender. We end up side-stepping the dead wood, dancing around it, ignoring it, wishing mightily it would go away. Oh, and complaining about it. So, even though the dead wood isn't doing much, it's sapping the energy and focus of many others. (There must be a Law of Physics about this!) Where to start and how to implement? While removing dead wood is not the most pleasant of responsibilities, it does not need to be -- and s...

Change for Your Board in 2010: A Polling Update

WE'RE A DAY INTO MY LAST POLL (SEE RIGHT) AND the responses are clustering in two areas: 1) removing dead wood from the board and 2) using better/different tools to make decisions/evaluate performance. There are still six days left for your colleagues to cast their vote! In the meantime, those of you who are in need of tools for decision-making might want to check my posts on taking stock here , here and here .